Biowaiver Considerations for Sustained-Release (SR) Dosage Forms

A biowaiver for a sustained-release (SR) dosage form is generally more challenging to obtain compared to immediate-release (IR) forms due to the complexity of drug release mechanisms and potential impact on bioavailability. However, under certain conditions, a biowaiver may be possible based on in vitro dissolution studies and in vivo-in vitro correlation (IVIVC).

Key Considerations for Biowaiver of SR Dosage Forms

Regulatory Framework

    • The USFDA, EMA, and ICH do not generally allow biowaivers for SR formulations unless robust IVIVC is established.
    • Some agencies may consider biowaivers for lower strengths of the same formulation if a proportionality rule is met.

    In Vitro Dissolution Testing

      • Dissolution profile comparison across strengths using multiple dissolution media (pH 1.2, 4.5, 6.8).
      • Similarity factor (f2) ≥ 50 to demonstrate equivalence between test and reference formulations.
      • Dissolution must be independent of pH and robust under varied conditions.

      IVIVC (In Vivo-In Vitro Correlation)

        • A Level A IVIVC (predictive mathematical relationship between in vitro dissolution and in vivo absorption) is typically required for a biowaiver.
        • If IVIVC is established, in vitro dissolution can be used as a surrogate for bioequivalence.

        Proportional Formulation and Dose Linearity

          If multiple strengths are developed, the lower strengths may be eligible for a biowaiver if:

          • The formulations are proportional in composition.
          • They exhibit dose-proportional pharmacokinetics.
          • The release mechanism remains unchanged across strengths.

          BCS Classification of the API

            • Biowaivers are not applicable for BCS Class II (low solubility, high permeability) and BCS Class IV (low solubility, low permeability) drugs.
            • In rare cases, BCS Class I (high solubility, high permeability) drugs with IVIVC-established SR formulations may qualify.

            Regulatory Precedence & Justifications

              • If a reference listed drug (RLD) or innovator product has obtained a biowaiver, it strengthens the case.
              • Literature supporting biopharmaceutical equivalence and post-approval changes guidance (e.g., SUPAC-MR for modified release forms) may help.

              Conclusion

              A biowaiver for sustained-release formulations is only granted under strict conditions, primarily when a robust IVIVC exists, the formulation is proportionally similar, and dissolution studies are predictive of in vivo performance. Otherwise, a bioequivalence study remains mandatory.


              Read also:


              Resource Person: Moinuddin syed. Ph.D, PMP®

              Similar Posts

              Leave a Reply